| 287153632 | What actions, if any, did your court take during the reporting period to reduce delays and improve case management? | Actions taken during FY 2017-2018 to reduce delays and improve case management. |
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Actions taken during FY 2017-2018 to reduce delays and improve case management.
|
|
|
|
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective
3rd JDC | The 3rd JDC made use of video arraignments. |
10th JDC | The 10th JDC instituted a specific court date to make sure both the State and the defendant have gotten the information each needs to keep the case from stalling. |
14th JDC | Judges received periodic reports on pending felonies per division to help keep track of how each division's case flow compares to other divisions. |
16th JDC | The court conducted review hearings to better monitor and manage criminal cases and added additional criminal dates to the court calendar as needed to facilitate the current case load and reduce delays in the processing of criminal cases. The judges maintained a policy to provide for protective order service to be made in open court and to be reflected in court minutes, as well as the allotment of non-support appeals to ensure timely and uniform processing throughout the district.
The court maintained an allotment system for juvenile cases which created two juvenile sections in each parish, one for Child in Need of Care cases and one for juvenile delinquent and Families in Need of Services cases. Juvenile court dockets are assigned to one judge in each parish, an initiative that results in greater continuity of adjudication, better judicial oversight and improved proficiency. CASA advocates are authorized and encouraged to attend 72-hour hearings in Child In Need of Care cases to help facilitate the appointment of curators as soon as possible. The court maintained a Family Court Program in Iberia, St. Martin and St. Mary Parishes. Three full-time hearing officers conducted pre-trial conferences in all family court matters. Hearing officers in all three parishes conducted intake procedures and conferences between involved parties and attorneys in all matters concerning divorce, child custody and visitation, child support, spousal support, use and occupancy of the home and of movables, community property, and petitions for protective orders. The hearing officers made recommendations for the continued development and expansion of the program.
The Family Court Programs in each parish improved scheduling the time from filing to Hearing Officer Conferences by expediting the family court cases with the Clerk of Court, consistently setting the initial setting of the conference within 21 to 28 days after filing unless the attorney's calendar did not allow it. The court strove to ensure that Hearing Officer Conferences are held within 21 days of the date of filing. In domestic cases, involving individuals from out-of-state, St. Mary Parish held the Hearing Officer Conference on the same date as the court date, prior to the rule so that the out-of-state parties, in most cases, only have to travel to the State of Louisiana on one occasion. In addition, St. Mary Parish Family Court made every effort to resolve the case prior to trial and will allow an out-of-state party’s appearance for the Hearing Officer Conference, with approval from the Judge, to be facilitated by Skype or telephone. The papers are mailed to the out-of-state party for signature and returned to the Court. Both Consent Judgments and Hearing Officer Recommendations are often handled in this manner in St. Mary Parish to eliminate the need for an out-of-state party to make a personal appearance. The hearing officers, working in conjunction with the District Attorney and clerks of court, implemented a standardized pleading system across all three parishes. In doing so, the hearing officers now have similar pleadings across the jurisdiction. |
29th JDC | The court contracted with mediators and facilitators to assist in contentious domestic cases. |
East Baton Rouge Family Court | East Baton Rouge Family Court used expedited trial dockets for ex parte custody, domestic violence, and relocation cases. |
|
| Response | Response_Court |
| Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective | 6 courts (3rd JDC, 10th JDC, 14th JDC, 16th JDC, 29th JDC, East Baton Rouge Family Court) |
| Continued to address this objective through the actions indicated below, or implemented the following new actions to address this objective as indicated below: | 42 courts (1st JDC, 2nd JDC, 3rd JDC, 4th JDC, 5th JDC, 6th JDC, 7th JDC, 8th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 11th JDC, 12th JDC, 14th JDC, 15th JDC, 16th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 20th JDC, 21st JDC, 22nd JDC, 23rd JDC, 24th JDC, 25th JDC, 26th JDC, 28th JDC, 29th JDC, 30th JDC, 31st JDC, 32nd JDC, 33rd JDC, 35th JDC, 36th JDC, 37th JDC, 40th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Family Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court) |
| Did not address | 6 courts (13th JDC, 19th JDC, 27th JDC, 34th JDC, 38th JDC, 39th JDC) |
| Employed case managers to expedite court processes | 3 courts (15th JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court) |
| Encouraged alternative dispute resolution | 19 courts (1st JDC, 2nd JDC, 3rd JDC, 6th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 12th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 20th JDC, 21st JDC, 26th JDC, 28th JDC, 29th JDC, 35th JDC, 36th JDC, 40th JDC, East Baton Rouge Family Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court) |
| Implemented or maintained the use of pre-trial conferences | 36 courts (1st JDC, 2nd JDC, 3rd JDC, 4th JDC, 5th JDC, 6th JDC, 7th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 11th JDC, 12th JDC, 15th JDC, 16th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 20th JDC, 22nd JDC, 23rd JDC, 24th JDC, 25th JDC, 26th JDC, 28th JDC, 29th JDC, 30th JDC, 31st JDC, 33rd JDC, 35th JDC, 36th JDC, 37th JDC, 40th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Family Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court) |
| Implemented or maintained time standards for case processing | 11 courts (4th JDC, 10th JDC, 11th JDC, 15th JDC, 18th JDC, 28th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court) |
| Improved communication with police, sheriffs, and/or marshals | 29 courts (1st JDC, 2nd JDC, 5th JDC, 6th JDC, 7th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 11th JDC, 12th JDC, 15th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 20th JDC, 21st JDC, 22nd JDC, 23rd JDC, 24th JDC, 25th JDC, 26th JDC, 28th JDC, 33rd JDC, 36th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Family Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court) |
| Improved docketing and scheduling | 26 courts (1st JDC, 2nd JDC, 5th JDC, 6th JDC, 7th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 11th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 20th JDC, 21st JDC, 25th JDC, 26th JDC, 29th JDC, 30th JDC, 33rd JDC, 35th JDC, 36th JDC, 40th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Family Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court) |
| Improved the manual system of case processing | 11 courts (2nd JDC, 3rd JDC, 6th JDC, 7th JDC, 10th JDC, 17th JDC, 28th JDC, 33rd JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Family Court) |
| Installed or maintained an automated case allotment system | 19 courts (1st JDC, 4th JDC, 7th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 15th JDC, 16th JDC, 24th JDC, 26th JDC, 29th JDC, 30th JDC, 36th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Family Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court) |
| Installed or maintained an automated case management system | 12 courts (9th JDC, 10th JDC, 17th JDC, 25th JDC, 29th JDC, 36th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Family Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court) |
| Planned the development of an automated case management system | 5 courts (22nd JDC, 28th JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court) |
| Took steps to reduce cases under advisement | 22 courts (2nd JDC, 5th JDC, 6th JDC, 7th JDC, 10th JDC, 11th JDC, 15th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 20th JDC, 25th JDC, 26th JDC, 28th JDC, 29th JDC, 30th JDC, 33rd JDC, 35th JDC, 36th JDC, 42nd JDC, East Baton Rouge Family Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court) |
| Used docket status reports | 9 courts (15th JDC, 20th JDC, 25th JDC, 28th JDC, 36th JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court) |
|
|