Performance Report- Louisiana Supreme Court

Performance of the City and Parish Courts

Fiscal Year 2017 - 2018

GOAL I: ADVANCE JUDICIAL COMPETENCY

Objective

1.4 Enhance Judicial Competence Through Court Management

Intent of the Objective

Responses To Objective

Members of your bench attended seminars or continuing education sessions on court management and/or leadership.
Court staff members attended seminars or received training in court management and/or leadership.
Your court surveyed court staff satisfaction.
If your court surveyed court staff satisfaction, what areas did you survey?
Your court solicited public input.
Please share any other strategies that you used or details of the strategies you described above to advance judicial competence in court management.
Please share any obstacles you encountered in advancing judicial competence in court management and suggestions, if any, to overcome those obstacles.

Data pager
Data pager
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page 5 of 7, items 5 to 5 of 7.

Data pager
Data pager
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page 5 of 7, items 5 to 5 of 7.

(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)

Your court solicited public input.

If yes, how was the public input solicited?

BAKER CITY COURT	Public input was solicited through an annual public budget hearing.
BATON ROUGE CITY COURT	The court used a survey to solicit public input.
MONROE CITY COURT	The public was made aware of different events at the court through posted notices, newspaper articles, television and radio announcements.
NEW ORLEANS MUNICIPAL AND TRAFFIC COURT	The court received public input through responses received on the court's web page.
PINEVILLE CITY COURT	The judge invited several people to sit in and observe criminal court proceedings. He then asked for their input on how to make people feel more welcome and at ease in court.
SLIDELL CITY COURT	Public input was solicited during all open court sessions and speaking engagements; lawyers, as well as the public, were encouraged to provide feedback regarding court operations and management.

Response	Response_Court
If yes, how was the public input solicited?	6 courts (BAKER CITY COURT, BATON ROUGE CITY COURT, MONROE CITY COURT, NEW ORLEANS MUNICIPAL AND TRAFFIC COURT, PINEVILLE CITY COURT, SLIDELL CITY COURT)
No	42 courts (ABBEVILLE CITY COURT, ALEXANDRIA CITY COURT, ASCENSION PARISH COURT, BASTROP CITY COURT, BOGALUSA CITY COURT, BOSSIER CITY COURT, BREAUX BRIDGE CITY COURT, BUNKIE CITY COURT, CROWLEY CITY COURT, DENHAM SPRINGS CITY COURT, EUNICE CITY COURT, HAMMOND CITY COURT, HOUMA CITY COURT, JEANERETTE CITY COURT, JEFFERSON PARISH 1ST PARISH COURT, JEFFERSON PARISH 2ND PARISH COURT, JENNINGS CITY COURT, KAPLAN CITY COURT, LAFAYETTE CITY COURT, LAKE CHARLES CITY COURT, LEESVILLE CITY COURT, MARKSVILLE CITY COURT, MINDEN CITY COURT, MORGAN CITY COURT, NATCHITOCHES CITY COURT, NEW IBERIA CITY COURT, NEW ORLEANS 1ST CITY COURT, NEW ORLEANS 2ND CITY COURT, OAKDALE CITY COURT, OPELOUSAS CITY COURT, PLAQUEMINE CITY COURT, PORT ALLEN CITY COURT, RAYNE CITY COURT, RUSTON CITY COURT, SPRINGHILL CITY COURT, SULPHUR CITY COURT, THIBODAUX CITY COURT, VIDALIA CITY COURT, WEST MONROE CITY COURT, WINNFIELD CITY COURT, WINNSBORO CITY COURT, ZACHARY CITY COURT)
Yes	3 courts (FRANKLIN CITY COURT, SHREVEPORT CITY COURT, VILLE PLATTE CITY COURT)