Performance of the District Courts

Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016

Back

Campaign 2: Develop Effective Communication


Objective

OBJECTIVE B: IMPROVE COMMUNICATION WITHIN THE COURT

Intent of the Objective

Responses To Objective

  1. The judges of your court communicate directly with one another electronically.
  2. Your court held regular en banc meetings.
  3. If your court held regular en banc meetings, how frequently were they held?
  4. Every judge on your court attended at least 50% of the scheduled en banc meetings.
  5. Your court had committees of judges tasked with projects or areas of interest.
  6. If your court had committees of judges tasked with projects or areas of interest during the reporting period, please list the committees and areas of focus.
  7. During the reporting period, the COOP or DRP information on communication between or among judges and staff in an emergency was reviewed and updated if necessary.
  8. Your court provided training for court staff during the reporting period.
  9. If your court provided training for court staff during the reporting period, how many trainings were provided?
  10. Your court used a system of communication with court staff to promote the sharing of court information (newsletters, emails, meetings, etc.).
  11. If your court used a system of communication with court staff to promote the sharing of court information during the reporting period, please describe the system and how often it was used.
  12. Please share any obstacles you encountered in improving communication within the court and suggestions, if any, to overcome those obstacles.
  13. Please share any other strategies that you used or the details of the strategies above that you used to improve communication within the court.

✖
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 5 of 13, items 5 to 5 of 13.
QuestionIdQuestionStatementResponse
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 5 of 13, items 5 to 5 of 13.
1010800068Your court had committees of judges tasked with projects or areas of interest.Your court had committees of judges tasked with projects or areas of interest.
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Your court had committees of judges tasked with projects or areas of interest.
Refresh Charts
ResponseResponse_Court
Not applicable - one judge court8 courts (8th JDC, 11th JDC, 28th JDC, 31st JDC, 35th JDC, 37th JDC, 38th JDC, 39th JDC)
Strategy was implemented during the reporting period5 courts (15th JDC, 25th JDC, 36th JDC, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court)
Strategy was implemented prior to the reporting period and is ongoing21 courts (1st JDC, 4th JDC, 6th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 13th JDC, 14th JDC, 16th JDC, 19th JDC, 21st JDC, 22nd JDC, 23rd JDC, 24th JDC, 30th JDC, 32nd JDC, 34th JDC, 40th JDC, 42nd JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court)
Strategy was not implemented during the reporting period and is not ongoing14 courts (2nd JDC, 3rd JDC, 5th JDC, 7th JDC, 12th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 20th JDC, 26th JDC, 27th JDC, 29th JDC, 33rd JDC, East Baton Rouge Family Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court)

© 2025 - Louisiana Supreme Court, 400 Royal St., New Orleans, LA 70130