1010682519 | What actions, if any, did your court take during the reporting period to assist pro se/self-represented litigants? | Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to assist pro se/self-represented litigants. |
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to assist pro se/self-represented litigants.
|
|
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective
1st Circuit | The clerk's office assisted pro se litigants as much as possible with answering procedural questions without giving legal advice. The clerk's office posted various checklists on the court's website to aid litigants in preparation of filings. In court orders involving pro se litigants, the court generally provided a basic outline of the steps a pro se litigant might take when technical problems associated with submissions of applications or pleadings cause the filing to be rejected prior to review on the merits. |
2nd Circuit | The Second Circuit pro se manual was available in both print and electronic format. The electronic version is available on our website and the printed manual is routinely mailed upon request and is available at the front counter.
The court website provided checklists for filings and notice of new/amended rules that may affect procedures. Our fees were also published on the website and in the pro se manual.
A pro-active approach was taken to ensure physical accessibility to all citizens; the court consistently reviews internal procedures and policies to promote equal accessibility for all. |
3rd Circuit | The Third Circuit posted its Pro Se Manual and Handbook of Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit Procedure on its website as well as appellate brief and supervisory writ checklists to aid litigants in appellate procedure. The court also provides copies of the manual by mail and will e-mail the appellate record to the litigant or provide a CD. |
4th Circuit | The Fourth Circuit generally allows pro se litigants more flexibility as to requests for extensions of time, the form of their briefs, and the nature of oral arguments. |
|
Response | Response_Court |
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective | 4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit) |
Continued to address this objective through the actions indicated below, and implemented the following new actions to address this objective as indicated below: | 5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit) |
Did not address this objective | 0 |
Provided generic petitions and other forms | 2 courts (3rd Circuit, 5th Circuit) |
Referred pro se/self-represented litigants to legal service corporations | 2 courts (1st Circuit, 5th Circuit) |
Worked with the clerk of court and/or local bar association to provide information to the public regarding appellate procedures | 4 courts (1st Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit) |
|
|