Performance of the District Courts

Fiscal Year 2017 - 2018

Back

Campaign 3: Advance Judicial Competency


Objective

OBJECTIVE D: SELF-REVIEW/DATA COLLECTION

Intent of the Objective

Responses To Objective

  1. Your court solicited public input.
  2. If your court solicited public input, how was it solicited?
  3. Your court tracked juror service.
  4. If your court tracked juror service, how did it do so? Please check all that apply:
  5. Your court surveyed employee and court personnel satisfaction.
  6. If your court surveyed employee and court personnel satisfaction, what areas did you survey?
  7. Additional strategies used or the details of the strategies above used to advance judicial competency through self-review/data collection.
  8. Obstacles encountered in advancing judicial competency through self-review/data collections and suggestions, if any, to overcome those obstacles.

✖
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 7 of 8, items 7 to 7 of 8.
QuestionIdQuestionStatementResponse
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 7 of 8, items 7 to 7 of 8.
287153627Please share any additional strategies or the details of the strategies above in which your court advanced judicial competency through self-review/data collection.Additional strategies used or the details of the strategies above used to advance judicial competency through self-review/data collection.
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Additional strategies used or the details of the strategies above used to advance judicial competency through self-review/data collection.
Refresh Charts
33rd JDC
The court administrator met with individual employees throughout the year to evaluate areas in need of improvement and used this information to discuss strategies with judges on employee assignments and tasks.

© 2024 - Louisiana Supreme Court, 400 Royal St., New Orleans, LA 70130