Performance of the District Courts

Fiscal Year 2016 - 2017

Back

Campaign 1: Provide Adequate Access to Justice


Objective

OBJECTIVE F: SELF-REVIEW / DATA COLLECTION

Intent of the Objective

Responses To Objective

  1. Your court solicited public input regarding providing access to justice.
  2. If your court solicited public input on its efforts to provide access to justice, what methods did you use?
  3. Your court collected data on access to justice issues such as requests for interpreters, appearances by self-represented litigants, pro bono representations, Americans with Disability Act requests, or in forma pauperis applications.
  4. If your court collected data on issues related to access to justice, what data was collected?
  5. Please share any additional strategies or the details of the strategies above in which you provided adequate access to the courts through self-review/data collection.
  6. Please share any obstacles you encountered in providing adequate access to the courts through self-review/data collection and suggestions, if any, to overcome those obstacles.

✖
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 3 of 6, items 3 to 3 of 6.
QuestionIdQuestionStatementResponse
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 3 of 6, items 3 to 3 of 6.
184932584Your court collected data on access to justice issues such as requests for interpreters, appearances by self-represented litigants, pro bono representations, Americans with Disability Act requests, or in forma pauperis applications.Your court collected data on access to justice issues such as requests for interpreters, appearances by self-represented litigants, pro bono representations, Americans with Disability Act requests, or in forma pauperis applications.
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Your court collected data on access to justice issues such as requests for interpreters, appearances by self-represented litigants, pro bono representations, Americans with Disability Act requests, or in forma pauperis applications.
Refresh Charts
ResponseResponse_Court
Strategy was implemented during the reporting period0
Strategy was implemented prior to the reporting period and is ongoing12 courts (1st JDC, 6th JDC, 14th JDC, 24th JDC, 32nd JDC, 36th JDC, 42nd JDC, East Baton Rouge Family Court, Jefferson Parish Juvenile Court, Orleans Parish Civil District Court, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court)
Strategy was not implemented during the reporting period and is not ongoing36 courts (2nd JDC, 3rd JDC, 4th JDC, 5th JDC, 7th JDC, 8th JDC, 9th JDC, 10th JDC, 11th JDC, 12th JDC, 13th JDC, 15th JDC, 16th JDC, 17th JDC, 18th JDC, 19th JDC, 20th JDC, 21st JDC, 22nd JDC, 23rd JDC, 25th JDC, 26th JDC, 27th JDC, 28th JDC, 29th JDC, 30th JDC, 31st JDC, 33rd JDC, 34th JDC, 35th JDC, 37th JDC, 38th JDC, 39th JDC, 40th JDC, Caddo Parish Juvenile Court, East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court)

© 2024 - Louisiana Supreme Court, 400 Royal St., New Orleans, LA 70130