Performance of the District Courts

Fiscal Year 2016 - 2017

Back

Campaign 1: Provide Adequate Access to Justice


Objective

OBJECTIVE F: SELF-REVIEW / DATA COLLECTION

Intent of the Objective

Responses To Objective

  1. Your court solicited public input regarding providing access to justice.
  2. If your court solicited public input on its efforts to provide access to justice, what methods did you use?
  3. Your court collected data on access to justice issues such as requests for interpreters, appearances by self-represented litigants, pro bono representations, Americans with Disability Act requests, or in forma pauperis applications.
  4. If your court collected data on issues related to access to justice, what data was collected?
  5. Please share any additional strategies or the details of the strategies above in which you provided adequate access to the courts through self-review/data collection.
  6. Please share any obstacles you encountered in providing adequate access to the courts through self-review/data collection and suggestions, if any, to overcome those obstacles.

✖
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 2 of 6, items 2 to 2 of 6.
QuestionIdQuestionStatementResponse
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 2 of 6, items 2 to 2 of 6.
184931138If your court solicited public input on its efforts to provide access to justice, what methods did you use?If your court solicited public input on its efforts to provide access to justice, what methods did you use?
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
If your court solicited public input on its efforts to provide access to justice, what methods did you use?
Refresh Charts
Other
9th JDC
The court worked with the local bar association, legal services, and the Pro Bono Project.
12th JDC
The court held person-to-person discussions with self-represented litigants and jurors.
22nd JDC
No formal inquiry has been undertaken. However, the need for self-representation assistance has been discussed by the court with various groups as well as the three bar associations in the district.
24th JDC
The court held discussions with court users, attorneys and public officials.
33rd JDC
Court staff spoke with self-represented litigants who had voiced concerns.
35th JDC
The court requested input from jurors.
36th JDC
An advisory committee was set up by the Police Jury to work with the court to address access to justice issues.
40th JDC
The court solicited suggestions from local bar associations and practicing attorneys.
Orleans Parish Juvenile Court
Judges spoke to community groups.
ResponseResponse_Court
Online performance review0
Other9 courts (9th JDC, 12th JDC, 22nd JDC, 24th JDC, 33rd JDC, 35th JDC, 36th JDC, 40th JDC, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court)
Suggestion box0
Survey questionnaire2 courts (31st JDC, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court)

© 2024 - Louisiana Supreme Court, 400 Royal St., New Orleans, LA 70130