Performance of the Courts of Appeal

Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016

Back

GOAL 3: TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC TRUST


Objective

3.1 To ensure that the courts of appeal are accessible procedurally, economically, and physically to the public and to attorneys.

Intent of the Objective

Making courts accessible to attorneys and to the public protects and promotes the rule of law. Confidence in the review of the decisions of lower tribunals is promoted when the appellate court process is open, to the fullest extent reasonable, to those with an interest in a matter. Appellate courts should identify and remedy access problems relating to court costs, court procedures, courthouse features, and other barriers that may limit participation in the appellate process. The cost of litigation can limit access to the judicial process. When a party lacks sufficient financial resources to pursue a good-faith claim, the court should make provisions to minimize or defray the costs associated with the presentation of the case. Physical features of the courthouse can constitute formidable barriers to persons with disabilities who want to observe or participate in the appellate process. Courts should make accommodations so that individuals with speech, hearing, vision, cognitive, or physical impairments can participate in the court’s processes.

Responses To Objective

  1. Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to assist pro se/self-represented litigants.
  2. Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to ensure that the public was aware of the openness and accessibility of court proceedings.
  3. Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to develop and/or maintain a policy or procedure to assist patrons with limited English proficiency (LEP).
  4. Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
  5. Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to implement safety and security measures.
  6. Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to implement a Continuity of Operations/Disaster Recovery Plan.

Data pager
Data pager
 Page 5 of 6, items 5 to 5 of 6.
QuestionIdQuestionStatementResponse
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 5 of 6, items 5 to 5 of 6.
1010682531What actions, if any, did your court take during the reporting period to implement safety and security measures?Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to implement safety and security measures.
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Actions taken during FY 2015-2016 to implement safety and security measures.
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective
1st Circuit
The First Circuit hosted an Appellate Court Security Office Conference in order to review procedures and share insight on security from each of the state's circuit courts. The court adopted a shelter-in-place plan and reviewed the library lock system to design internal shelter-in-place locking areas. The court periodically has fire and shelter-in-place drills. The court appointed a safety officer who obtained the required annual training in Police Officer Standards and Training (POST). The court has designated first responders for any medical emergencies and floor wardens to coordinate and assist with in-house evacuation and safety procedures.
2nd Circuit
Composed a "Desk Book" for security personnel
3rd Circuit
The Third Circuit maintained the court's security personnel as full-time employees of the court.
4th Circuit
The Fourth Circuit is located in same building as the Supreme Court and shares some security measures.
ResponseResponse_Court
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit)
Appointed a safety officer4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Continued to address this objective through the actions indicated below, or implemented the following new actions to address this objective as indicated below:5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Developed or maintained a cyber security policy3 courts (2nd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Developed or maintained a safety policy5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Developed or maintained a security policy4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Did not address this objective0
Formed or continued a courthouse security committee4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Had a cyber security audit performed0
Had a security audit performed0
Implemented or continued coordination of security with law enforcement officials and/or stakeholders3 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Implemented or maintained an emergency evacuation procedure5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained closed-circuit security cameras at strategic locations5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained metal detectors at courthouse entrances5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained perimeter security for the courthouse3 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained security alarms/panic buttons in judges' chambers/courtrooms5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Sponsored safety and/or security training5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Trained court personnel in better security5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)

© 2024 - Louisiana Supreme Court, 400 Royal St., New Orleans, LA 70130