Performance of the Courts of Appeal

Fiscal Year 2016 - 2017

Back

GOAL 3: TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC TRUST


Objective

3.1 To ensure that the courts of appeal are accessible procedurally, economically, and physically to the public and to attorneys.

Intent of the Objective

Making courts accessible to attorneys and to the public protects and promotes the rule of law. Confidence in the review of the decisions of lower tribunals is promoted when the appellate court process is open, to the fullest extent reasonable, to those with an interest in a matter. Appellate courts should identify and remedy access problems relating to court costs, court procedures, courthouse features, and other barriers that may limit participation in the appellate process. The cost of litigation can limit access to the judicial process. When a party lacks sufficient financial resources to pursue a good-faith claim, the court should make provisions to minimize or defray the costs associated with the presentation of the case. Physical features of the courthouse can constitute formidable barriers to persons with disabilities who want to observe or participate in the appellate process. Courts should make accommodations so that individuals with speech, hearing, vision, cognitive, or physical impairments can participate in the court’s processes.

Responses To Objective

  1. Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to ensure that the public was aware of the openness and accessibility of court proceedings.
  2. Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to assist pro se/self-represented litigants.
  3. Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to develop and/or maintain a policy or procedure to assist patrons with limited English proficiency (LEP).
  4. Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
  5. Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to implement safety and security measures.
  6. Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to implement a Continuity of Operations/Disaster Recovery Plan.

Data pager
Data pager
 Page 6 of 6, items 6 to 6 of 6.
QuestionIdQuestionStatementResponse
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 6 of 6, items 6 to 6 of 6.
184771063What actions, if any, did your court take during the reporting period to implement a Continuity of Operations/Disaster Recovery Plan?Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to implement a Continuity of Operations/Disaster Recovery Plan.
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Actions taken during FY 2016-2017 to implement a Continuity of Operations/Disaster Recovery Plan.
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective
1st Circuit
The court continued its participation in the Louisiana WIN System, an emergency radio system for court security personnel, judges, and key staff to allow and facilitate internal and external communication statewide with all law enforcement and emergency preparedness officials. The court also updated COOP and contact information with the Louisiana Supreme Court. The court explored an alternate facility for records storage in the event court operations are shut down.
2nd Circuit
The court's COOP includes contact information for three (3) commercial realtor companies to acquire an alternative location in the event of a prolonged displacement. The court also began scanning opinions and rulings to a separate server, as PDFs searchable by docket number.
ResponseResponse_Court
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective2 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit)
Addressed records safety, management, and/or access in the event court operations are shut down or displaced4 courts (1st Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Continued to address this objective through the action indicated below, or implemented the following new actions to address this objective as indicated below:5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Coordinated the COOP/DRP with all appropriate government officials and justice system partners4 courts (2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Developed or updated a COOP/DRP5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Did not address this objective0
Identified and secured an alternate facility in the event court operations are shut down4 courts (1st Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Included alternate means of communication in the COOP/DRP in the event that regular means of communication are unavailable4 courts (1st Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Included current contact information for judges and other court personnel in the COOP/DRP5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Included current contact information for other agencies or people with whom the court interfaces, such as law enforcement5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Included procedures in the COOP/DRP to support the full range of court operations in the event of a prolonged displacement from the courthouse4 courts (1st Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Provided all those involved in implementing the COOP/DRP, inside and outside the court, with a copy of the plan and all updates or changes4 courts (2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Provided training for the COOP/DRP4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit)
Tested the COOP/DRP on a regular basis4 courts (1st Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)

© 2024 - Louisiana Supreme Court, 400 Royal St., New Orleans, LA 70130