Performance of the Courts of Appeal

Fiscal Year 2014 - 2015

Back

GOAL 3: TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC TRUST


Objective

3.1 To ensure that the courts of appeal are accessible procedurally, economically, and physically to the public and to attorneys.

Intent of the Objective

Making courts accessible to attorneys and to the public protects and promotes the rule of law. Confidence in the review of the decisions of lower tribunals is promoted when the appellate court process is open, to the fullest extent reasonable, to those with an interest in a matter. Appellate courts should identify and remedy access problems relating to court costs, court procedures, courthouse features, and other barriers that may limit participation in the appellate process. The cost of litigation can limit access to the judicial process. When a party lacks sufficient financial resources to pursue a good-faith claim, the court should make provisions to minimize or defray the costs associated with the presentation of the case. Physical features of the courthouse can constitute formidable barriers to persons with disabilities who want to observe or participate in the appellate process. Courts should make accommodations so that individuals with speech, hearing, vision, cognitive, or physical impairments can participate in the court’s processes.

Responses To Objective

  1. Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to assist pro se/self-represented litigants.
  2. Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to ensure that the public was aware of the openness and accessibility of court proceedings.
  3. Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to develop and/or maintain a policy or procedure to assist patrons with limited English proficiency (LEP).
  4. Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
  5. Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to implement safety and security measures.
  6. Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to implement a Continuity of Operations/Disaster Recovery Plan.

Data pager
Data pager
 Page 5 of 6, items 5 to 5 of 6.
QuestionIdQuestionStatementResponse
Data pager
Data pager
 Page 5 of 6, items 5 to 5 of 6.
857700273What actions, if any, did your court take in FY 2014-2015 to implement safety and security measures?Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to implement safety and security measures.
(Hover on the chart for more information and click on the chart to see which courts chose that response.)
Actions taken in FY 2014-2015 to implement safety and security measures.
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective
1st Circuit
The court adopted a shelter-in-place plan and reviewed the library lock system with the Administrative Conference to design internal shelter-in-place locking areas. The court periodically has fire and shelter-in-place drills. Also, the court appointed a safety officer who obtained the required annual training in Police Officer Standards and Training (POST).
3rd Circuit
The Third Circuit maintained the court's security personnel as full-time employees of the court. This has resulted in greater operational efficiency and management effectiveness. The deputies are subject to one set of rules, with uniform and consistent direction.
ResponseResponse_Court
Additional actions taken by the courts to address this objective2 courts (1st Circuit, 3rd Circuit)
Appointed a safety officer4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit)
Continued to address this objective through the actions indicated below, or implemented the following new actions in FY 2014-2015 to address this objective as indicated below:5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Developed or maintained a cyber security policy2 courts (4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Developed or maintained a safety policy5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Developed or maintained a security policy4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Did not address in FY 2014-20150
Formed or continued a courthouse security committee5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Had a cyber security audit performed1 court (5th Circuit)
Had a security audit performed2 courts (2nd Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Implemented or continued coordination of security with law enforcement officials and/or stakeholders4 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Implemented or maintained an emergency evacuation procedure5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained closed-circuit security cameras at strategic locations5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained metal detectors at courthouse entrances5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained perimeter security for the courthouse5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Installed or maintained security alarms/panic buttons in judges' chambers/courtrooms5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Sponsored safety and/or security training5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)
Trained court personnel in better security5 courts (1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 3rd Circuit, 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit)

© 2024 - Louisiana Supreme Court, 400 Royal St., New Orleans, LA 70130